A Legal Case For Ending Muslim Immigration
Wednesday
I am an ACTivist in California, and I follow your website daily. Lately, there has been an increasing call for a halt in Muslim immigration. There is actually a law on the books that would allow the President to ban the immigration of certain groups of people:
8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens (f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
It sounds like a great idea. Needless to say, our current President would be unlikely to do that. The other problem is making a case to justify such action. Check out this list of 45 Muslim terror attacks since 9/11/01 just published by WND. The list is hardly complete, as two notable honor murders for Fatima Abdallah (2009) and Shaima Alawadi (2012) are missing. Of the 45, as far as I can determine, only 9 were perpetrated by alien Muslims. The rest of the Muslims were naturalized U.S. citizens.
Maybe the appropriate and sell-able action would be to follow the example of the Charlottesville massacre. We didn’t round up all of the rednecks or KKK members. Instead we lowered the Confederate flag. Somehow we have to condemn and ostracize the Quran as “hate speech” or “incitement to violence” using the same language that the OIC is using in its attempts to criminalize any criticism of Islam. UN Resolution 16/18 calls for “taking a unified and determined stand to combat intolerance and hatred based on religion or belief.” (per Sixth OIC Observatory Report 2012)
There are plenty of texts in the Quran that meet that condition — including Surahs 5:60 and 2:65 (Jews are apes), 5:51 (friendship with Christians and Jews forbidden), and 5:63 (rabbis and priests commit evil). The Skeptics Annotated Bible website lists 537 intolerant verses in the Quran based on religion or lack thereof. That could certainly provide grounds for condemning the Quran.
Chris, Los Angeles
4 comments:
I agree that the issue of muslim immigration must be a priority. It seems like the current administration in the mean time is hastening the ushering in of thousands of muslim immigrants through the refugee resettlement program. Can this be stopped?
Someone emailed this comment:
Code 1182 will not be useful to us until we can get a Conservative Republican in office, and probably will also take a few more Muslim attacks on our soil to help it along.
In the meantime, I like Chris's second idea. Why can't we get FRC, ACLJ, or Larry Klayman (Freedom Watch) to effectively sue Islam? Start with a particularly bad mosque, like the one in Boston, and assert that since they follow and preach the hatred listed in the Qur'an, they are fomenting an environment of discrimination, oppression, violence, hatred, and murder. Use that to shut down the mosque, receive a civil judgment for the victims of the Boston Marathon bombing, and then move on to the next mosque. Anyone following and espousing the Qur'an and Hadiths would be liable. Worth a try? I'll pass it by a few of the more major organizations with lawyers, and see if anyone is inclined to pursue it.
The more people approaching these organizations, and proposing the idea, the better.
Here's a link to view more about inadmissible aliens.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2011-title8/USCODE-2011-title8-chap12-subchapII-partII-sec1182/content-detail.html
Vett political candidates on this, publicize your results and with enough of that, like minded candidates should get elected.
Post a Comment