Bill Warner's Strategy For Neutralizing the Apologists for Islam
Monday
Bill Warner has a new video outlining a way for small groups of counterjihadists to neutralize the arguments of apologists and to stop the silence of the media about the disturbing nature of Sharia law. You can watch his video here:
Voices for the Voiceless
I suggest that you watch this video at your next ACT! for America or Q Society meeting, and then start putting the strategy into action.
8 comments:
Bill Warner is *outstanding* with all of the work that he does against Islam!
I put him in the same league as Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller!
Many apologist for Islam make the claim that God of the Bible is the same God as the god of Islam. This claim is false. The reason that this idea of both religions having the same God started when truth compromising Bible "translators" substituted the word Allah where the word God should have been used in the Arabic translation of the Bible. Furthewrmore,in the glossary in the book ASSASSIANS ! by Dr. Haha defines Allahs as the "Pre-Islamic Lunar god: the god of Islam." Likewise,in the book INSIDE ISLAM by Reza F. Safa on Pages 22,23. reads "In pre-Islamic times both Allah-worship and Baal-worship involved worship of the sun ,the moon, and the stars which defines them as Astral religions. [Such cults are condemned in the Bible, Second Kings 21:3,5. 23:5. Second Chronicles 33:5.] The cresent moon, which is the symbol of moon worship is also the symbol of Islam." In short. in spite of what the apologsits may claim the God of the Bible is not the god of Islam.
The words in brackets are my own.
Very important suggestion.
Thank you.
All counter-jihadists should try to make use of this.
Great idea! This might be a good way to get churches to be interested in Islam. Liberals are not interested in the pain and suffering of Christians, so I don't think this idea will work with them, but Christian churches ought to be interested.
My Four rules to obliterate my opponents in debate:
1.Keep It Simple
2.Keep it Practical
3.Shift the burden of proof
4.Enjoy yourself
You have to learn about the intricate details of islamic theology, but in depth knowledge should only be used for tactical reasons, to debunk something and move back to the topic. Its dangerous to your credibility to discuss Sahih Bukhari 22. 05. 034 to make a point. it ends up in discussing which translation is correct, if the hadith are reliable and so on.
An example of Keep It Simple & Keep It Practical:
"Give me six countries where Muslim majorities or Minorities respect Western Human rights"
Then rip them to shreds after they have answered. Point out how peaceful any other religion in those countries are.
Another simple talking point is to discuss the behaviour of Muhammad's dearest friends and the first caliphs.
Rule number four is the most important.
I personally think we need our own Q&A website where noobs can ask for ammunition for debate and veterans can point them too it. There are some forums but they are too obscure, they also have too many subforums and topics get lost all the time.
Thank you for pointing out this Bill Warner video. It presents the best strategy I've ever seen, by far. It requires very little knowledge, and it does not require that one even mention the word "Islam." Many Islam-critics will say nothing publicly, because effectiveness against charges of bigotry requires far too much knowledge and far too much courage, especially when one must consider Islamic violence against critics. But Warner's strategy frees one of that whole problem. One need not ever mention Islam! One need not know anything about Islam! Just talk about the victims! The great thing about scientists (Warner's background is as a physicist) is that they can be so darned effective.
Spencer is a brilliant educator. But Warner is the great strategist. Bravo! This video should go way viral. This video is absolutely key.
Oz, here's an excellent online counter-jihad manual:
Counter-Jihad Manual
I hope he's right, but the left doesn't seem to care at all about the victimhood of Christians and Jews. They're so caught up in the brotherhood of victimization with Muslims, I don't know if they can ever let go of that little whiny issue. But, I hope it works. Regardless, we must vote the current administration out and not vote for anyone even remotely associated with it before we can even think about making any progress. We simply cannot lose 2,000 years it took to create Western Civilization. There probably won't be a peaceful solution to this.
Post a Comment